The Corn Refiners Association has its opinion about the matter, that HFCS is the same as table sugar, that there are no differences in the amount of fructose and glucose (two simple sugars) between the two. Because it's getting a negative view in the media, consumers aren't consuming it. They even have a website displaying their views, even so much to say that a name change is needed. They would like to call it "corn sugar" (which they do use in their ads) and need the FDA's approval to put the new name on labels.
Important figures in the world of food safety and politics are speaking up on the topic, those like Marion Nestle. Others' opinions can be read here and here. But rather than focus on opinions, I'm going the more scientific route with this rant on the subject. Here are seven peer-reviewed articles on the topic, some that are meant to argue for one side of the argument, but hopefully all are objective about the research that is out there for us, the public, to read and learn.
I went with articles that are free to the public, so please don't be afraid to step out and look for articles that try to objectively explain the debate. My favorite place to look is PubMed, which is one of the best scientific sources for peer-reviewed papers.
My personal opinion, there are differences between HFCS and table sugar. First off, table sugar is a solid, while HFCS is manipulated and ultimately is in the form of a liquid. That is a huge difference! And with a manufacturer of HFCS near my residence, the smell that emanates from the factory is disgusting, something between rotting potatoes left in sweaty socks and human excrement shoved in my nose, but what I really think...
Moral of the story: become educated on the subject and make the decision for yourself.